AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Finicky framer9/21/2023 User ( 23:11) This frame store is using my store's photo located in southern California, Monrovia!! They have been notified many times. Be careful you don’t price yourself out of business. the gallery, Frame To Please, in Red Bank, is doing it for $30. User ( 01:55) I thought I should let you know that the picture I brought in to have the glass replaced and you quoted $60. I only asked for the service I paid in full up front for within the time she promised. Dina made me feel like I was a second-class customer and put her failure to deliver on promises back on me, as if I was being unreasonable. She promised to actually start them today, and told me she'd "drop everything" like I was inconveniencing her! She took my money fast enough! I hope I do get my posters but I will take my business elsewhere in future. So many promises have been broken and I've heard so many excuses, and when I laid out the facts and what she'd told me before, Dina was really impolite and refused to provide a refund when I asked. Dina promised she would have them done last Saturday after I called last week, but she never started them and never called me like she said she would. Six weeks later, my posters haven't even been started. I was asked to pay in full up front for a quicker turnaround of two weeks (she actually said she'd try to have them done before Christmas but I said two weeks was okay if she couldn't manage it). I love pictures still, that I had framed by her 20 years ago!! User ( 01:37) I am really disappointed as I was a new customer to this business. I love love love working with Dana & the results are priceless. She has a great eye for color and always has the perfect frame & matting, but she is never pushy about her opinion. As you can see, the proportion of highly biased estimates decreased greatly, but there are still some there, and again only in the N = ~ 120 - 140 range.What Others Say about this business: User ( 02:20) The owner, Dana, is always very personable. I decreased that to 1%.Ģ) I included one bin beyond the furthest observation in each dataset (by changing the function defining the breaks to:īreaks <- c(0, round((max(y$distance+1)/cats)*(1:(cats +1))))ģ) I included a wider range of sample sizes, just to see what would happen. This morning I tried a few things to see if I could fix it:ġ) In the above example I was truncating the furthest 10% of data. (Note that I capped bias at 2 so that the blue gam() line fit on the plot.) When simulating a lot of datasets (in the same way I produced the dataset in my original post) and analyzing the results, the bias looks like this: Bumping resolution up from 1080p to 1440p narrows the gap, with frame rates increasing from 81 to 88fps. Obviously, there might be an error somewhere else in my code (but I haven't been able to figure out where.). Specifically, the GPU churns out 108fps in Total War: Troy, compared to 91fps at launch. With the data that I'm simulating, it only seems to be an issue when the sample size is between ~ 122 and 148 observations. I noticed that the estimates look fairly flat (at a glance), but I'm not convinced that entirely explains the issue. Unmarked.estimates <- ame(Item = c("density", "sigma"),Įstimated = c(unmarkeddensity_bias, unmarkedsigma_bias)) Unmarkedsigma <- backTransform(hn_Null, type='det') # extract estimate of detection parameter & calculate bias Unmarkeddensity <- backTransform(hn_Null, type="state") # extract density estimate & calculate bias # 2 different options for distance breaks.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |